

Seeing Others, Seeing Ourselves
All are foreigner at some point
Engaging, informative, thought-provoking essays.

New Comic books are not Treasures
"Tragedy" is Terrific
Been There, Done That... Got the Shirt"The Borden Tragedy" is near perfect in all it's pictoral details and facts. I can attest to this as I have actually stayed the night in the infamous guest room where dear ol' step-mommy's bludgeoned body was found, had a lengthy conversation with the Borden historian in Fall River, read the interrogation notes and the police blotter from the time of Lizzie's arrest, as well as having dug up as much information as I possibly could before my actual visit so I would be ready to ask a plethora of questions. I can tell you with absolute certainty: Geary has his act together here.
For those of you that might not be familar with the term "graphic novel", it basically means "a really fancy comic book with lots of words". Be that as it may, Geary managed to cram pack the pages with more information about the Borden case than you can shake a bloody axe handle at. (Granted, there is still quite a bit more to the case... but this is just a comic book designed for light reading!)
The illustrations are beautifully intricate and detailed. All the maps of town and of the rooms within the residence itself are accurate... down to the placement of furniture. Geary introduces briefly throughout the novel many of the alternate theories and possible other suspects to the grisly murders. He has done a wonderful job of recreating the entire series of events that took place that stifling summer of 1892.
Included at the rear of the book are several pages of press clippings of the time as well as Lizzie's Indictment. The back cover has an eerie comparison of the Borden case to that of the Simpson case a hundred years later.
There are about 3 discrepencies I have found within the pages of "The Borden Tragedy", but they are so minute that they really don't bear mentioning. I highly recommend this book to anyone that has a love of comics, Borden affectionados/collectors, or simply anyone wanting a very brief yet still accurate introduction to one of the most famous unsolved crimes in all of american history.


The First Published BookThe rooms where the bodies lay were in perfect order; doors locked, windows closed. The victims showed no signs of struggle, their blood had not bespattered the rooms and furniture as it generally does under these circumstances. The assassin had left absolutely no trace of himself (p.13). A sudden unforeseen attack that killed with the first blow. The house had not been robbed, nor was any enemy known of with such hatred as to commit these assassinations.
Special officer Philip Harrington questioned Lizzie; suspicions were raised in the minds of the police that she knew more than she cared to tell. The police and the mayor searched the house from cellar to attic, delved into every nook and corner; every particle of hay in the barn loft and every blade of grass was turned over. Nothing was found.
The autopsy found 13 blows on the head of Mr. Borden, 18 on the skull of Mrs. Borden. The cuts were deep and long and any one would have produced instant death. Could any but a madman have struck so ruthlessly and unerringly, time and time again?
The Government side presumed that Lizzie would desire to bring the butcher to the gallows (p.76). It was either him or Lizzie. It was supposed she would answer every question, and volunteer every particle of information in her possession. She had everything to gain, and nothing to lose. But the Government must have known that this charge would leave a blotch on her name, and if acquitted, would forever blight her life. After Lizzie's arrest the Woman's Auxiliary of the YMCA held a prayer for her, the WCTU and religious societies all over the country did the same (p.80).
Mr. Jennings describes the murder on page 126. "There is an unnecessary brutality about this that suggests nothing but insanity or brutal hatred." "Every blow showed that the person who wielded that hatchet was a person of experience with the instrument." "... no hand could strike these blows that had not a powerful wrist and experience in handling a hatchet."
Regarding the claimed attempt to purchase poison, Jennings says "If there is one thing which is weakest in criminal cases it is the matter of mistaken identity. The books are full of such references" (p. 130). Page 195 gives the testimony of Prof. Edward S. Wood; he tested the Bordens' stomachs and found no prussic acid, or other poisonous substances. He calculated the difference in time of death at about one and a half hours.
Page 137 Knowlton discusses Lizzie's changed stories about what she was doing that morning. He then asks why the sender of the note to Mrs. Borden never came forward, and concludes it never was sent. Knowlton also claimed the absence of bloodstained clothing is proof of her guilty concealment! Lizzie was indicted and held for the Grand Jury. Hilliard and Seaver posted bond for Bridget, ex-Congressman Davis for Mr. Morse (as material witnesses).
Chapter XXI tells of the Trickey-McHenry affair that resulted in one of the most famous hoaxes of the time. False information was given to a reporter, who rushed this scoop into print. The reporter was then indicted as a result of this plot; he fled the country, and died accidentally. McHenry had been hired to watch the Pinkerton men, who had been hired by Jennings to watch the police. McHenry had previous trouble with Trickey's reporting on a trial in Denver, and another case. McHenry claimed Trickey was reporting to the Pinkertons in Boston.
Pages 212-213 quote George D. Robinson as to the killer "a maniac or fiend", "not a man in his senses ... but a lunatic or a devil". "They were well-directed blows.... They were aimed steadily and constantly for a purpose, each one finding its place where it was aimed, and none going amiss on the one side of the other." "The perpetrator of that act knew how to handle the instrument, was experienced in its control, had directed it before or others like it, and it was not the sudden, untrained doing of somebody who had been unfamiliar with such implements."
Pages 266-267 tell how Lizzie shielded Bridget and Andrew's workmen from suspicion (they were checked out anyway). This left her as the remaining suspect; but she never told! Page 280 says "there is a skeleton in the household of every man, but the Borden skeleton - if there was one - was fairly well locked up from view. They were a close-mouthed family."
Pages 304-311 contain part of Justice Dewey's charge to the jury. Robert Sullivan's "Goodbye, Lizzie Borden" has it all. After an hour the jury returned with its verdict of "Not Guilty". "Lizzie Andrew Borden returned guiltless to her friends and home in Fall River."
Lizzie Borden took a walk,
To let her Dad have his talk;
When she came back to the room,
She found Dear Dad met his doom.
You Can't Chop Your Poppa Up In Massachusetts

An OK account of the case, but very one-sided
Just the Facts, Liz
Best Pictures and Background FactsThe chapter on rumors carries the full text of the anonymous letter from Albany (most likely Joseph Carpenter?) sent to both the Prosecutor and the Marshall. The misspelled "Bordon" name is just a sample of "plausible denial", in case somebody (with a hatchet) came to talk to him. The letter that was later found on a Rome NY street pointing to J. Carpenter was a way to get even; somebody connected with the case wasn't fooled.
This book is a very good complementary to Arnold R. Brown's "final chapter" on the case - as good a solution as you can find after a century.
Edward Radin's 1961 book re-investigated the case, and talked to some contemporaries who knew Lizzie. He was the first to show Pearson's biased reporting, and had his own solution (based on his own experiences as a crime reporter).
The 1973 book by Robert Sullivan, lawyer and judge, provides another point of view. His opinion that "there was enough evidence to convict" shows prejudgment of the case. His book quotes Judge Justin Dewey's charge to the jury, as true and important today as a century ago. He interviewed Abby Borden Whitehead Potter, Abby's niece (and Godchild?).
The most important thing about this case was the condition of the blood of the victims. Red and liquid for freshly-killed Andrew, black and clotted for Abby (predeceased for over an hour). Think about that in a more recent case!


Read Friday Night Lights
Basketball Sociology
ONE OF THE GREATEST SPORTS BOOKS I'VE EVER READ!

Gorman DELIVERS the goods and then some...Gorman keeps the story moving along, despite some slow spots, paces it well and keeps the premise pretty basic. The only pet peeve I have is the repetitive dialogue.
"Really?"
"Really."
That is what I mean. He does this several times during the novel and it gets a little annoying after doing it 4 or 5 times.
However, the novel is excellent overall and Gorman is a master storyteller. This is a must-read for Gorman fans.
A GUILTY PLEASUREWe meet Ben Tyler, an average looking "nerd" who finds himself falling in love with the mysterious Allison. Allison has her own sordid past, in that a roommate of hers was brutally murdered the year previously. Ben doesn't know this of course. Ben has a loving mother, who is a veterinarian, and a charming, handsome older brother, Michael, who wows the women, including one Denise Fletcher, a married woman whose husband is maniacally jealous. Enter David Weyrich, a seasoned PI, who is looking for one Steve Conners, who he is sure killed Allison's roommate, and just happens to be a good friend of none other than Michael Tyler.
Gorman gives us some very touching scenes, including one in which Ben has to help his mother put his feline-leukemia afflicted kitten to sleep. This is poignant and rare in a book of this nature.
Of course, there are now shocking surprises, once we find out the truth about Steve and Michael; from then on, it's a cat and mouse game, with the evil villain doing his best to silence those who could give away his dreaded secret.
Gorman presents a strong case of inherited traits, in that the killer may have inherited his traits from his murderous grandfather.
All in all, the story has some great moments, and even though our beloved heroine bites the dust, Ben's revenge, along with the just desserts for Allison's killer keep the plot moving.
A nice, sneaky thriller.
GREAT READ

Came for the Daredevils and Got an Education
The Rise and Falls of NiagaraThe stories mostly develop along one of two themes - daredevil encounters with the Falls, and human manipulation, either for the purpose of exploitation or protection of the Falls. Berton is best with the small stories of explorers, tightrope walkers, barrel riders, a family of "rivermen" (the Hills), and their ilk. The small becomes large with what is perhaps the best-crafted story, that of Lois Gibbs and the toxic tragedy of Love Canal, with which Berton ends the book.
Although the story of the Falls did not end in 1980, Love Canal is a fitting final story. Despite the occasional preservationist triumphs, the story of the Falls really culminates in Love Canal. The natural wonder of the Falls became framed by hucksters, factories, power stations, tacky museums, homes, roads, manicured parks and everything else unnatural. Engineers even managed to stop the falls in an attempt to clear out fallen rocks (they wisely chose not to once they realized that the rocks propped up the rock face behind the falls). A visit to the Falls today is a jarring reminder of what a mess we humans have made of the natural world. It is an obscene juxtaposition of nature's best and humanity's chintziest.
Berton is less skilled at relaying scientific stories about the formation of the falls, and the energy and chemical industries. He also seems less than passionate when writing about big business deals - his treatment of power-mavens Adam Beck and Robert Moses palls beside his treatment of activist Lois Gibbs or "riverman" Red Hill. As a result, the book is somewhat inconsistent and (ironically, considering the subject matter) does not always flow.
Conspicuously missing from "Niagara" is ancient Native American history and the eventful history of the last 20 years. The former may not be possible to write for lack of information, but the latter (which includes the establishment of a gambling casino overlooking the Falls) warrants an update. Also lacking is some of the political history surrounding the Falls. For all these reasons, this is more a three-and-a-half star book than a full four star book. But I'm givivng it four because it was fun to read and provided me, as a native of Western New York, with some history of my home region. I'm not sure how interesting all this will be for those with no personal experience of the Falls, but for those of us who do, its worth reading.
Excellent anecdotal history of Niagara Falls

A fascinating theory that Brown simply cannot proveOne would probably be better served by reading other accounts in order to get the facts of the case in mind before taking on this author. Brown jumps around in his narrative to some degree, and he never really lays out a timetable for what happened when on that fateful morning. We learn the accepted facts of the case from him in a rather piecemeal fashion. Along the way, his own conviction almost teases the reader. Remember this, he tells the reader, for it will be important later. Further along, he begins to make bold statements, holding off the proof of them for some later chapter. As he begins describing the inquests and trial, he contaminates the valuable evidence of fact he has with a conviction that seems unwarranted. He proclaims that local government officials planned every aspect of the case from inquest to trial for the sole purpose of charging and acquitting Lizzie Borden in a way that allowed no possibility of the real murderer's identity becoming known. He never presents a good enough argument for why the town leaders should prostitute the law in this manner. Brown alleges that virtually every principal in the trial's proceeding knew who the murderer was and worked conspiratorially to produce the result that indeed came about'namely, Lizzie's acquittal. Even undeniably honorable men on the prosecuting team and behind the judge's bench were all active performers in a farcical drama. While I can't buy all he is selling on these points, Brown does do a very good job at pointing out many extraordinary aspects of the trial, especially many mysterious aspects to the prosecutor's case and the exceedingly strange decisions and pronouncements from the bench. His words are convincing, but I cannot objectively accept everything he pronounces as truth without more evidence.
After building up interminably for the big finish, the moment when he will announce who in fact killed Andrew and Abby Borden, Brown seems to let his excitement get away from him in the concluding chapter. His evidence can simply not be proven, even if he is correct. Brown makes the situation worse by putting forth a timeline in which he ascribes definite actions to a number of players without offering any proof whatsoever'his summary contains information he never even mentioned elsewhere in the book. He names Lizzie as a conspirator after the fact, one who knew the murderer but did not know he had rewritten everyone's plans for that morning by actually killing the elder Bordens. I found Brown's argument as to why she quickly decides to cover up the murderer and allow herself to stand trial for the heinous crimes somewhat problematic and unsatisfactory'materialism and a desire to save the Borden name from embarrassment don't seem to do it for me, and Uncle John Morse's purported role in the central events strikes me as even harder to justify in Brown's scenario.
This is a fascinating book that all armchair detectives interested in the Borden case should read. One great strength of Brown's book is his inclusion of the long-lost testimony of Lizzie Borden from the original inquest, evidence that was not allowed during the actual trial. He relies heavily on information from this inquest to build his case, but many of his discoveries are perfectly capable of being twisted in different directions by other sleuths. Arnold Brown is simply too sure of himself; he has contributed useful information and speculation into the Borden murder mystery, but he allows himself to lose objectivity. It may well be that he is correct, and many of his ideas certainly deserve intense thought and investigation, but his theories simply cannot be proven, and his overzealous attempt to explain why each actor in this drama did what he/she did actually damaged some of his credibility in my eyes. Brown would have us believe that every halfway important man in Fall River knew the truth about the case and worked together to turn the trial into a mockery of justice for reasons that simply are not convincing, especially when you allow for the obvious public danger posed by the madman Brown dubs the actual killer.
Century-old Mystery Solved!The solution works by implicitly explaining why Bridget Sullivan was paid to leave the country: she knew too much (but didn't know it). Bridget must have seen William Borden visiting. She didn't know that he worked as a butcher, was skilled with a hatchet, had a violent temper, and spent time in a mental hospital. She would have found out that he was more than a cousin. Bridget's testimony was not favorable to Lizzie, so there was no pay-off here.
AR Brown's book alone discusses the actions of the local ruling class, and the politicians who do their bidding. The spontaneous halt in working, a virtual general strike, had to be ended. There were no labor leaders to be jailed and oppressed. There was a great need to resume production. Somebody had to be arrested for the crime to quell the restless natives. Lizzie was picked to try to break her so she would talk; it didn't work. Lizzie kept her mouth shut, and the family secret.
AR Brown says that such official corruption is always possible when the price and conditions are right. You can review your own local history, and judge for yourself. (One author compared the guiltless Lizzie to the innocent OJ.)
A Very Important BookA R Brown was born and raised in Fall River. He retired to Florida, and met Lewis Peterson (also from Fall River). When the subject of Lizzie Borden came up, Lewis said his father-in-law Henry Hawthorne knew the real killer. Hawthorne's mother-in-law Ellan Eagan passed by the Borden house that morning.
Before Henry Hawthorne died in 1978 he left notebooks filled with his memories of that event. A R Brown read them, then checked those facts for historical verification. His book is the result of his investigation. The "Acknowledgments" list the many people who helped with the book, which provides the "best evidence" for its solution to this famous unsolved mystery.
Little or no documentation is available, as the author stated, for any further proof. He noted that there was a work stoppage, which put pressure on the local establishment to find a solution. The Mellen House Gang would not leave documents for their actions in 1892, as with most current politicians. (We still don't have an official legal solution to the JFK assassination.)
The book "Forty Whacks" provides complementary information on the events of the time. Note the "anonymous" letter from Albany (Joseph Carpenter?) who seemed to know something about the crime. Like today, people may know things but do not wish to get involved with powerful authorities who have their own agenda.
I think there may have been more information left out of the book.
One important but little known fact mentioned in this book is the condition of the blood for a freshly killed body (red and liquid) compared to one dead for over an hour (black and clotted). Think about that in a more recent double murder case.


interesting at first
An invaluable bibliographic source of Borden-ianaPrecisely how much has been written about America's most famous unsolved crime - and by whom? The answer has been deftly supplied by Robert Flynn, doyen of Borden scholars. His annotated bibliographic handlist, which contains titles through 1992, is divided into eleven sections, ranging from Non-Fiction to The Opera/ The Ballet and Poetry and Rhymes - lacking only a section on ms. materials. The annotations are perceptive and succinct and will prove invaluable for the seasoned collector as well as the novice. Hopefully, from time to time Mr. Flynn will issue up-dates/ supplements and even consider adding some documentation of unpublished "sources." His notes would most certainly answer many nagging questions, including the most annoying of all: why the trial transcripts have not been published after nearly 107 years - there are copies in the Boston Public Library and the Fall River Historical Society. Surely it is not for want of an audience! Then there is the matter of two file drawers of legal papers locked away in the law offices founded by Lizzie's attorney George Robinson - beyond doubt the last cache of new historical evidence on one of America's most sensational mysteries. Ostensibly the Borden files are privileged, according to Arnold Rosenfeld (Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers): "The duty to protect confidential information survives death in Massachusetts. That's clear. There's case law." [A rather terse and dismissive statement.] Ah, Lizzie...we are still spellbound. And curious.


Not For the Serious Borden Enthusiast
Not worth the effort
My first Lizzie experience